Abstract
Objective: The main objective of this study is to report on the implementation and results of the “Supporting Health-Related Judicial Decisions in Brazil” project conducted at the Health Technology Assessment Center, Hospital Sírio-Libanês through the “Programa de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Institucional do Sistema Único de Saúde”, in Brazil. Methods: This study is an experience report of a project conducted at the Health Technology Assessment Center, Hospital Sírio-Libanês. Results: The activities of the project occurred in 2023 and included two online training courses on primary studies and systematic reviews, 11 one-day workshops with technical-scientific content for members of the Technical Support Centers for the Judiciary (NATJus), 40 online technical-scientific consultations for magistrates on a digital platform, 11 technical-scientific reports addressing the most legally claimed technologies in Brazil; two methodological tools, a national forum (hybrid event), 10 chat-based mentorships for NATJus members; and the maintenance of an open-access blog, by publishing news on relevant topics on law and health. Discussion and conclusion: This project has contributed to the improvement of the judicial decision-making process by providing a range of activities aimed at aiding the prioritization of health technologies that are clearly effective and safe over those that are ineffective, harmful, or have uncertain effects.
Submission: 04/09/24| Review: 06/29/24| Approval: 08/18/24
References
Brasil. Lei nº. 8080, de 19 de setembro de 1990. Dispõe sobre as condições para a promoção, proteção e recuperação da saúde, a organização e o funcionamento dos serviços correspondentes e dá outras providências. Presidência da República. Casa Civil. Brasília, 1990 [cited on March 19, 2024]. Available at: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8080.htm
Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Demandas judiciais relativas à saúde crescem 130% em dez anos 2019 [Internet]. Conselho Nacional de Justiça; 2019 [updated on 18 mar. 2019; cited in March 04, 2024], Notícias CNJ. Available at: https://www.cnj.jus.br/demandas-judiciais-relativas-a-saude-crescem-130-em-dez-anos/
Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Estatísticas processuais de direito a saúde 2023 [Internet]. Conselho Nacional de Justiça; 2023 [updated on March 04, 2024; cited on March 04, 2024], Notícias CNJ. Available at: https://paineisanalytics.cnj.jus.br/single/?appid=a6dfbee4-bcad-4861-98ea-4b5183e29247&sheet=87ff247a-22e0-4a66-ae83-24fa5d92175a&opt=ctxmenu,currsel
Morozowski A. Judicialização da saúde - Valor Econômico. Tribunal Regional Federal da 2a Região [Internet]; 2019 [updated on June 12, 2019; cited on March 04, 2024]. Available at: https://www10.trf2.jus.br/comite-estadual-de-saude-rj/judicializacao-da-saude-valor-economico-12619/#:~:text=Estima%2Dse%20que%2C%20em%202018,para%20cumprir%20as%20decis%C3%B5es%20judiciais
Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Amazonas. Cartilha Informativa: Você conhece o NATJus? Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Amazonas [Internet]; 2023 [updated on September 29, 2023; cited on March 04, 2024]. Available at: https://www.tjam.jus.br/index.php/component/fileman/file/CARTILHA%20-%20NATJUS.pdf?routed=1&container=fileman-attachments#:~:text=O%20e%2DNatJus%20%C3%A9%20o,lan%C3%A7ados%20manualmente%20pelos%20NATJUS%20regionais
Floriano FR, Boeira L, Biella CD, Pereira VC, Carvalho M, Barreto JO et al. Strategies to approach the judicialization of health in Brazil: an evidence brief. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva [Internet]. 2023. [cited on March 04, 2024] 28(1):181-96. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/csc/a/V8NqnZbjJ6wrFBVrsztMQvr/?format=pdf&lang=en
Borin MC, Alves CB, Junior NG, de Fátima Guimarães M, de Assis Acurcio F, Álvares-Teodoro J, et al. PP406 Academic Detailing For Judges: Concepts Of Evidence-Based Medicine And Health Policies Adopted In Brazil. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care [Internet]. 2020 [cited on March 04, 2024]; 36(1):34-5. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care/article/pp406-academic-detailing-for-judges-concepts-of-evidencebased-medicine-and-health-policies-adopted-in-brazil/E807AC14356F0121F683A16549F1A471
Polanczyk CA, de Quadros AM, Fontanella AT, Zanotto AD, d Athayde Rodrigues F, Vianna DA et al. EBM distance learning course to support judicial decisions on healthcare: a case study. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2021 [cited on March 04, 2024] 26(5):266-7. DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111551
Riera R, Latorraca COC, Padovez RC, Pacheco RL, Romão DM, Barreto JO et al. Strategies for communicating scientific evidence on healthcare to managers and the population: a scoping review. Health Research Policy and Systems [Internet]. 2023 [cited on March 04, 2024] 21(1):1-20. Available at: https://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12961-023-01017-2
Kuchenmüller T, Boeira L, Oliver S, Moat K, El-Jardali F, Barreto J, et al. Domains and processes for institutionalizing evidence-informed health policy-making: a critical interpretive synthesis. Health research policy and systems [Internet]. 2022 [cited on March 04, 2024] 20(1):1-18. Available at: https://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12961-022-00820-7
Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ). Sistema e-NATJus [Internet]. Conselho Nacional de Justiça [cited on March 04, 2024], Fonajus. Available at: https://www.cnj.jus.br/programas-e-acoes/forum-da-saude-3/e-natjus/
Bowen S, Erickson T, Martens PJ, Crockett S. More than “using research”: the real challenges in promoting evidence-informed decision-making. Healthcare Policy [Internet]. 2009 [cited on March 04, 2024]; 4(3):87-102. DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2009.20538

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Isabela Porto de Toledo, Rafael Leite Pacheco, Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco, Carolina de Oliveira Cruz Latorraca, Roberta Borges Silva, Verônica Colpani, Rachel Riera (Autor)