The Regulatory Stage of pharmaceutical patents: Compulsory Licensing as a RD&I-based Regulatory Tool
PDF (Portuguese)

Keywords

Right to health. RD&I. TRIPS. Compulsory license. Regulation.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17566/ciads.v5i3.325

How to Cite

1.
The Regulatory Stage of pharmaceutical patents: Compulsory Licensing as a RD&I-based Regulatory Tool. Cad. Ibero Am. Direito Sanit. [Internet]. 2016 Sep. 30 [cited 2026 Jan. 29];5(3):50-64. Available from: https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/325

Abstract

Access to strategic medicines as a guarantee of the right to health was submitted to a decisive test in the first half of 2000s, when the US and Europe positioned themselves in frontal collision with several developing nations, particularly South Africa and Brazil, on the topic of extension of the legal construct of compulsory license inaugurated by the TRIPS Agreement. This paper puts side-by-side the legal construct of compulsory license and RD&I investment in the pharmaceutical sector as regulatory tools prone to interact in the law sociological stage, as they present themselves as acts of an encompassing regulatory scheme. The regulatory stage makes use of off-stage characteristics of the socioeconomic environment to set up those tools in different ways. Compulsory license has been used as a threat that blocks arbitrary price increase of drugs, while RD&I investment has been applied to counteract the big pharma expectations of state inability to produce drugs following specific threats to break patented pharmaceutical inventions. This paper addresses the role of RD&I investments towards drug development to modulate the efficacy of compulsory licenses.
PDF (Portuguese)

References

Prakash, Aseem. Greening the Firm: The Politics of Corporate Environmentalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

May, Peter J. Compliance Motivations: Perspectives for Farmers, Homebuilders and Marine Facilities. Law & Policy 27: 317-347, 2005.

Cotterrell, Roger. Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically? Journal of Law and Society 25(2): 171-192, 1998.

McKnight, Janet. The Fourth Act in Socio-Legal Scholarship: Playing With Law on the Sociological Stage. Qualitative Sociology Review 11(1): 108-124, 2015.

Waldo, Dwight. The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration. New Brunswick, US: Transaction Publishers, 2007.

Aranha, Márcio Iorio. Manual de Direito Regulatório: Fundamentos de Direito Regulatório. 3ª ed., Londres: Laccademia, 2015.

Picarelli, Marcia; Aranha, Márcio Iorio (org.). Política de Patentes em Saúde Humana. São Paulo: Editora Atlas, 2001.

World Health Organization. Report of an ASEAN Workshop on the TRIPs Agreement and its Impact on Pharmaceuticals. Jakarta, 2-4 de maio de 2000.

Morales, Diego Medina. El pensamiento ordinalista de Schmitt y el origen de la propiedad. In: Pavón, Dalmacio Negro (org.). Estudios sobre Carl Schmitt. Madrid: Fundación Cánovas del Castillo, p. 333-341.

Lopes, Ana Frazão de Azevedo. Empresa e Propriedade: Função Social e Abuso de Poder Econômico. São Paulo: Quartier Latin, 2006.

Schwartz, Andrew A. The Corporate Preference for Trade Secret. Ohio State Law Journal 74(4): 623-668, 2013.

Authors retain the copyright to their works and grant the Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (CIADS) the right of first publication.

All published articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original authorship and the source of publication are properly cited.