The Supreme Court and the judicial attachments in the health’s lawsuit: critical perspective and the need for administration system organization

Abstract

Objective: the present study seeks to examine the confrontation carried out by the Superior Court in the matter related to health and in the course of analyzing the existence of beacons related to the enforcement of judicial blockades in the subjects pending judgment. Methods: the deductive method was used to analyze the decisions of the Federal Supreme Court concerning the matter of judicial blockages in the face of the Public Power in health claims. Results: the matter of the judicialization of health finds transit with the Federal Supreme Court in multiple aspects. The current debate, embodied in Themes 6, 500 and 793, derives from the trajectory inaugurated with Public Hearing No. 4 and goes through the content of the STA No.175 decision. With regard to the core of effective judicial blockages in health demands, Binding Precedent Proposal No. 4 represented the search for stabilization of the subject. Conclusion: despite the broad and current debate in the Federal Supreme Court regarding the judicialization of health, the central analysis of the study leads to the verification of a reduced confrontation of the issue with regard to judicial blockages and the absence of the Court's determination of objective criteria to establish contours for judicial action in specific cases.